<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>jamezpolley.com &#187; WIN</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jamezpolley.com/category/win/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jamezpolley.com</link>
	<description>Rants, ramblings, and ruminations</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 May 2012 11:33:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
		<item>
		<title>Everything old is new again redux</title>
		<link>http://jamezpolley.com/2009/02/everything-old-is-new-again-redux/</link>
		<comments>http://jamezpolley.com/2009/02/everything-old-is-new-again-redux/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 09:59:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jamezpolley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[slugworthy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WIN]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://zhasper.com/?p=808</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lindsay did an excellent blog post yesterday titled &#8220;Everything old is new again&#8220;, about the re-emergence of multi-dimensioned databases. Great title, but just to prove his point, it applies even better to a post he shared on Google Reader a few days ago, written by Kurt Schrader and titled &#8220;Living in a Post Rails World&#8220;. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://holmwood.id.au/~lindsay/">Lindsay</a> did an excellent blog post yesterday titled &#8220;<a href="http://holmwood.id.au/~lindsay/2009/02/15/everything-old-is-new-again/">Everything old is new again</a>&#8220;, about the re-emergence of multi-dimensioned databases.</p>
<p>Great title, but just to prove his point, it applies even better to a post he shared on Google Reader a few days ago, written by Kurt Schrader and titled &#8220;<a href="http://kurt.karmalab.org/articles/2009/02/14/living-in-a-post-rails-world">Living in a Post Rails World</a>&#8220;. To quote that post:</p>
<blockquote><p>I think that the Ruby world is eventually going to end up in a model like this, writing small simple apps that all talk to each other, and can be replaced or upgraded at any time.</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>&lt;snip two paragraphs&gt;</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>All of my hard/long running logic is well tested, encapsulated, and most likely running in little agents on the wire.</p></blockquote>
<p>Sound familiar? It should. Kurt has re-discovered the same principles that the Holy Fathers of Unix discovered, over a quarter of a century ago. <a href="http://www.faqs.org/docs/artu/ch01s06.html">Doug McIlroy, circa 1978</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>(i) Make each program do one thing well. To do a new job, build afresh rather than complicate old programs by adding new features.</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>(ii) Expect the output of every program to become the input to another, as yet unknown, program. Don&#8217;t clutter output with extraneous information. Avoid stringently columnar or binary input formats. Don&#8217;t insist on interactive input.</p></blockquote>
<p>Later, he simplified it:</p>
<blockquote><p>This is the Unix philosophy: Write programs that do one thing and do it well. Write programs to work together. Write programs to handle text streams, because that is a universal interface.</p></blockquote>
<p>Of course, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Henry_Spencer">Henry Spencer</a> said it the best:</p>
<blockquote><p>Those who don&#8217;t understand UNIX are condemned to reinvent it, poorly.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jamezpolley.com/2009/02/everything-old-is-new-again-redux/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Habeas Corpus &#8211; granted.</title>
		<link>http://jamezpolley.com/2009/01/habeas-corpus-granted/</link>
		<comments>http://jamezpolley.com/2009/01/habeas-corpus-granted/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 10:34:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jamezpolley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[slugworthy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WIN]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://zhasper.com/2009/01/habeas-corpus-granted/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Reading the draft Executive Order ordering Guantánamo Bay detention facilities to be closed, one minor paragraph jumped out at me: (c) The individuals currently detained at Guantánamo have the constitutional privilege of the writ of habeas corpus. Most of those individuals have filed petitions for a writ of habeas corpus in Federal court challenging the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reading the draft Executive Order ordering Guantánamo Bay detention facilities to be closed, one minor paragraph jumped out at me:</p>
<blockquote><p>(c)  The individuals currently detained at Guantánamo have the constitutional privilege of</p>
<p>the writ of habeas corpus.  Most of those individuals have filed petitions for a writ of</p>
<p>habeas corpus in Federal court challenging the lawfulness of their detention.</p></blockquote>
<p>If that was the entirety of the order, it would be a huge step forward for people still imprisoned there &#8211; they&#8217;ll be able to force the government to justify their imprisonment, a right that was consistently denied to David Hicks and the other detainees.</p>
<p>You can read the whole order from a link at the bottom of <a href="http://www.aclu.org/safefree/detention/38437prs20090121.html">the ACLU&#8217;s press release.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jamezpolley.com/2009/01/habeas-corpus-granted/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Shelley the Republican on Ubuntu</title>
		<link>http://jamezpolley.com/2009/01/shelley-the-republican-on-ubuntu/</link>
		<comments>http://jamezpolley.com/2009/01/shelley-the-republican-on-ubuntu/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2009 12:10:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jamezpolley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[slugworthy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WIN]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://zhasper.com/?p=714</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[People have been telling me to read STR for ages, but I&#8217;ve never got around to it. Pascal just went to the site while I was shoulder surfing &#8211; and thus I discovered this review of Ubuntu: One of the great things about Windows is the ease of obtaining powerful utilities and applications. In addition [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>People have been telling me to read <a href="http://shelleytherepublican.com">STR</a> for ages, but I&#8217;ve never got around to it. <a href="http://klepas.org">Pascal</a> just went to the site while I was shoulder surfing &#8211; and thus I discovered <a href="http://shelleytherepublican.com/the-definitive-review-of-ubuntu-linux-804-hardy-heron">this review of Ubuntu</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>One of the great things about Windows is the ease of obtaining powerful utilities and applications. In addition to hundreds of great titles available on CD-ROM you can download awesome shareware applications: simply click on Setup.exe and most installers will instantly deploy your chosen software, sometimes with cool bonus productivity apps that enhance your browsing experience. In comparison with Microsoft’s common-sense approach, pandemonium reigns on the Linux platform.</p>
<p>The only way to install software is via a tool called the &#8216;package manager&#8217; which is confusingly also called &#8216;Synaptic&#8217;. This works according to a similar principle as a communist super-market: You have a limited range of software which has been chosen on a purely ideological basis rather than functionality. If you want to &#8216;think different&#8217;, it’s tough-luck again: Another obvious fail for the ‘contender’.</p>
<p>To make matters worse, in order to install an application you must be &#8216;root&#8217; which entails memorizing a series of confusing passwords. By contrast Windows allows any user to install the applications they need to do their work &#8211; a wise productivity gain that endears the flexible NT platform to IT departments the world over.</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://shelleytherepublican.com/the-definitive-review-of-ubuntu-linux-804-hardy-heron">The rest</a> is good reading too. Very informative! I&#8217;m switching away from Ubuntu forthwith.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jamezpolley.com/2009/01/shelley-the-republican-on-ubuntu/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

